VS
Your GOAT List
Can the grit of 'Special Ops: Lioness' outpace the historical gravitas of '1923'? Here lies a battlefield where modern warfare meets the rustic tales of the Dutton family legacy — a stark contrast not only in their timelines but in their narrative pulse and character arcs. This matchup isn't just a duel for the top spot in the Taylor Sheridan universe; it's a fight for cultural dominance and the redefinition of storytelling greatness. Which show embodies what fans truly value: the contemporary pulse of espionage or the enduring echoes of historical struggle?
In this battle:
Fans currently prefer 1923 over Special Ops: Lioness when it comes to the greatest Taylor Sheridan Shows of all time. In head-to-head matchups, fans pick 1923 80.0% of the time over Special Ops: Lioness.
Across all battles:
1923 win rate: 89.7%
Special Ops: Lioness win rate: 62.1%
The matchup fuels debate because it pits traditional historical drama against modern espionage thrillers. Fans are split between their love for classic Dutton family storytelling in 1923 and the contemporary, high-octane approach of Special Ops: Lioness. It's a classic battle of old vs. new styles in Taylor Sheridan's portfolio.
Fans love Special Ops: Lioness for its fresh take and gripping narrative in the spy thriller genre. Its high-stakes missions and strong female lead character add a modern twist that resonates with audiences eager for empowerment themes and heart-pounding action.
1923 is absolutely crushing it because fans can't get enough of its intense drama and deeper dive into the Dutton family saga. The expandable storyline and connections to the beloved Yellowstone universe really pull viewers in. Plus, who doesn't love a good historical spin?