Greatest Only Murders In The Building Characters of All Time
Charles-Haden Savage or Theo Dimas
Pick Your Favorite
VS
Your GOAT List
Why This Battle Matters
What does it truly mean to captivate an audience? In the 'Only Murders In The Building' universe, the silent intensity of Theo Dimas clashes with the seasoned charm of Charles-Haden Savage. Theo, with his compelling, understated presence, offers a stark contrast to Charles, whose rich narrative weaves decades of experience into each scene. This battle isn't just about who entertained more; it's a deeper question of whether raw, mysterious allure can trump classic, refined charisma. As fans, your choice will echo through the halls of this iconic building, shaping its legacy. What weighs more heavily on the scales of greatness: enigmatic silence, or eloquent verbosity?
🔥 Fan Takes
How Fans Are Voting
In this battle:
Fans currently prefer Charles-Haden Savage over Theo Dimas when it comes to the greatest Only Murders In The Building Characters of all time. In head-to-head matchups, fans pick Charles-Haden Savage 100.0% of the time over Theo Dimas.
Across all battles:
Charles-Haden Savage win rate: 76.9%
Theo Dimas win rate: 14.9%
Fan FAQs
Why are fans not rallying behind Theo Dimas as much?
Theo Dimas has his moments and a certain mysterious allure, but he just doesn't connect with the audience on the same level as Charles. His character's darker, more complex nature might not appeal as widely, especially in a head-to-head with a beloved character like Charles.
What's so appealing about Charles-Haden Savage?
Fans adore Charles for his clever wit and the depth he brings to 'Only Murders in the Building'. His past as a TV detective adds a layer of nostalgia and charm that really resonates with the audience.
Why is Charles-Haden Savage completely dominating against Theo Dimas in this fan vote?
Charles-Haden Savage is a fan favorite because of his quirky, endearing personality and his central role in the series, which really lets his character shine. Theo Dimas, while intriguing, plays a more mysterious and less prominent role, contributing to the significant voting gap.