Greatest University of Texas Quarterbacks of All Time
Sam Ehlinger or Chris Simms
Pick Your Favorite
VS
Your GOAT List
Why This Battle Matters
Is it the poise under pressure of Chris Simms or the clutch performances of Sam Ehlinger that defines greatness at Quarterback U? Here lies a tale not just of stats and gameplay but a deeper contrast that stirs the Longhorn spirit. Simms, with his pedigree and spotlight moments, offers a narrative of legacy and expectation. Ehlinger counters with gritty, heart-on-his-sleeve resilience, encapsulating the underdog fire. This battle isn't just about who threw more TDs—it's about what defines the soul of Texas football. Which quarterback truly embodies the values of Longhorn fans? Your choice tells that story.
🔥 Fan Takes
How Fans Are Voting
In this battle:
Fans currently prefer Sam Ehlinger over Chris Simms when it comes to the greatest University of Texas Quarterbacks of all time. In head-to-head matchups, fans pick Sam Ehlinger 100.0% of the time over Chris Simms.
Across all battles:
Sam Ehlinger win rate: 46.2%
Chris Simms win rate: 12.5%
Fan FAQs
Who's the #1 contender on GoatWars in the Greatest University of Texas Quarterbacks league?
The top spot currently belongs to Vince Young, known for his legendary plays and leading the Longhorns to a national championship. You can see the full rankings on the GOAT List.
Why is Sam Ehlinger winning by such a huge margin in the fan votes?
Sam Ehlinger's recent impact on the field and his emotional connection with fans are still vivid in their memories. His ability to lead dramatic comebacks and his sheer determination resonate deeply with the Longhorn community, possibly giving him this overwhelming edge in fan votes.
Why is this matchup between Chris Simms and Sam Ehlinger a big deal for University of Texas fans?
Fans are buzzing over this head-to-head because it pits two eras of Texas football against each other. Chris Simms represents the early 2000s powerhouse teams, while Sam Ehlinger is fresh in fans' memories for his gritty performances and leadership. It’s a classic debate of legacy versus recency.