VS
Your GOAT List
Who deserves the crown between Eric Dickerson, with his breathtaking speed and record-shattering 1984 season, and Marshall Faulk, the versatile powerhouse who redefined the role of a modern running back? This isn't just a contest; it's a clash of eras and philosophies. Dickerson, with his classic, punishing runs contrasts sharply against Faulk’s dynamic, all-purpose playstyle. What hangs in the balance here is not just a spot on the GOAT list, but how history will remember the evolution of the running back role. So, what weighs more to you: raw power and speed, or strategic versatility and adaptability?
In this battle:
Fans currently prefer Marshall Faulk over Eric Dickerson when it comes to the greatest NFL Running Backs of all time. In head-to-head matchups, fans pick Marshall Faulk 66.7% of the time over Eric Dickerson.
Across all battles:
Marshall Faulk win rate: 28.0%
Eric Dickerson win rate: 27.5%
The debate over Eric Dickerson versus Marshall Faulk lights up because it's a classic showdown between Dickerson’s pure rushing dominance and Faulk’s all-around utility. Fans are split depending on whether they value traditional running prowess or an all-purpose threat.
Fans adore Marshall Faulk for his dynamic play style and his ability to change the game in both the running and passing games. His flair for making pivotal plays when it mattered most really cements his place in the hearts of many.
Right now, Marshall Faulk is leading in the fan votes against Eric Dickerson. Fans seem to appreciate Faulk's versatility both as a runner and a receiver, which might be swaying the votes his way.