VS
Your GOAT List
Who deserves the crown between Eric Dickerson, with his breathtaking speed and record-shattering 1984 season, and Marshall Faulk, the versatile powerhouse who redefined the role of a modern running back? This isn't just a contest; it's a clash of eras and philosophies. Dickerson, with his classic, punishing runs contrasts sharply against Faulk’s dynamic, all-purpose playstyle. What hangs in the balance here is not just a spot on the GOAT list, but how history will remember the evolution of the running back role. So, what weighs more to you: raw power and speed, or strategic versatility and adaptability?
In this battle:
Fans currently prefer Marshall Faulk over Eric Dickerson when it comes to the greatest NFL Running Backs of all time. In head-to-head matchups, fans pick Marshall Faulk 70.0% of the time over Eric Dickerson.
Across all battles:
Marshall Faulk win rate: 28.8%
Eric Dickerson win rate: 27.2%
This matchup hits hard because you've got Faulk's all-around game up against Dickerson's iconic rushing achievements. It's a classic debate of versatility vs. peak performance, and fans are split based on what they value more in a running back's legacy.
Eric Dickerson's appeal comes from his record-smashing 1984 season where he set the single-season rushing record. His upright running style and speed make his highlights a favorite for fans who appreciate a pure rusher.
Marshall Faulk's versatility on the field really pulls in the votes. Fans love his ability to both rush and catch, making him a dual threat that's rare in the league. Plus, his key role in the 'Greatest Show on Turf' Rams really left a mark on NFL history.