Greatest Mr. Irrelevants of All Time
Marty Moore (1994) or Tyrone McGriff (1980)
Pick Your Favorite
VS
Your GOAT List
Why This Battle Matters
Ever pondered the storybook charm of the underdog in the face of overwhelming odds? Tyrone McGriff and Marty Moore embody that very essence in the Mr. Irrelevants of All Time league, where their tales of unexpected rise demand your attention. McGriff, a 1980 surprise who carved out a place in the hearts of traditionalists, contrasts sharply against Moore, the 1994 wonder whose career resonates with a more modern audience. This isn't just about who climbs higher in the GOAT List; it's a battle over the spirit of perseverance against the tides of expectation. Which underdog story tugs more at your heartstrings?
🔥 Fan Takes
How Fans Are Voting
In this battle:
Fans currently prefer Tyrone McGriff (1980) over Marty Moore (1994) when it comes to the greatest Mr. Irrelevants of all time. In head-to-head matchups, fans pick Tyrone McGriff (1980) 66.7% of the time over Marty Moore (1994).
Across all battles:
Tyrone McGriff (1980) win rate: 55.2%
Marty Moore (1994) win rate: 29.4%
Fan FAQs
What makes Marty Moore so popular?
Marty Moore’s appeal largely comes from being the first Mr. Irrelevant to play in a Super Bowl. This milestone, coupled with his solid NFL career, definitely makes him a fan favorite, especially among those who root for the underdog to make it big.
Why do fans love Tyrone McGriff?
Fans adore Tyrone McGriff for his underdog spirit and resilience. Drafted last but never let it define him, McGriff's time as a key player in the USFL and his inspiring journey from an overlooked draft pick to a celebrated player really pulls on the heartstrings.
Who is better: Tyrone McGriff or Marty Moore?
Right now, Tyrone McGriff is leading in the votes. It seems fans really resonate with his story and what he achieved despite being picked last in the 1980 draft. Plus, his impact on the field was memorable, which definitely gives him an edge in this battle.