VS
Your GOAT List
At first blush, a clash between Justice Cunningham and Marty Moore might resemble a mere footnote in sports history. Yet, as we peel back the layers, this head-to-head embodies a compelling narrative of resilience and redefinition. Cunningham, the last pick of 2013, represents the modern underdog—athletes who persist despite the odds. Moore, from 1994, echoes a more nostalgic era of grit and determination. What's at stake here is not just a spot on the GOAT list but an existential question: Which version of the underdog resonates more deeply with us today? Does our heart lean towards the raw determination of the '90s, or do we find a mirror in today's relentless pursuit of recognition?
In this battle:
Fans currently prefer Marty Moore (1994) over Justice Cunningham (2013) when it comes to the greatest Mr. Irrelevants of all time. In head-to-head matchups, fans pick Marty Moore (1994) 100.0% of the time over Justice Cunningham (2013).
Across all battles:
Marty Moore (1994) win rate: 30.0%
Justice Cunningham (2013) win rate: 60.0%
Brock Purdy is currently leading as the #1 contender in the Greatest Mr. Irrelevants of All Time. You can see the full rankings and how each contender is doing on the GOAT List.
It’s the classic tale of nostalgia versus recent memory. Marty Moore's journey from the last pick to a Super Bowl champ back in the '90s strikes a chord with a lot of fans. Meanwhile, Justice Cunningham represents a more recent era, but hasn't grabbed fan affection quite as strongly.
Fans are really rallying behind Marty Moore, perhaps because of his memorable transition from a 'Mr. Irrelevant' to a significant contributor on a Super Bowl-winning team. That underdog-to-champion story really resonates with fans, giving him an edge over Justice Cunningham.