Greatest Mr. Irrelevants of All Time
Chandler Harnish (2012) or Ryan Hoag (2003)

Pick Your Favorite

CHANDLER HARNISH (2012)

VS

RYAN HOAG (2003)
0%

Your GOAT List

Why This Battle Matters

Is there a more quixotic figure in sports than Mr. Irrelevant? Enter Chandler Harnish and Ryan Hoag, the antithesis of hype, yet champions of the underdog spirit. Harnish, the last pick in 2012, brings a narrative of resilience in modern football, while Hoag, from 2003, embodies the struggle and fleeting glimpses of the NFL dream. This isn't just about who held the title longer or who made more of an impact on the field; it's a cultural duel on persevering when the odds are stacked against you. Which story resonates more? Does the answer lie in our own battles against obscurity?

🔥 Fan Takes

I mean, do we even have a real contest here? Chandler's floating way above Ryan in the rankings, no debate.
Ryan Hoag at 0% win? yikes, my dude might as well be a ghost 😂
Honestly, Chandler Harnish brings back the vibes, man. Remember his draft year? Pure nostalgia!

How Fans Are Voting

In this battle:

The contenders are currently tied in head-to-head matchups. Your vote will break the tie.

Fan FAQs

Who's currently the top dog in the Greatest Mr. Irrelevants of All Time league?

Right now, Brock Purdy (2022) is dominating the leaderboard as the top contender in the league. You can check out his standing and others on the GOAT List.

What's drawing fans towards Ryan Hoag in the 'Greatest Mr. Irrelevants of All Time' league?

Fans love Ryan Hoag for more than just his football career; his personality and stint on reality TV really seal the deal. His diverse career and charismatic persona make him a standout in the league.

Why is this matchup between Chandler Harnish and Ryan Hoag so evenly split in votes?

It's super tight because both Harnish and Hoag have their unique appeals among fans. Chandler's known for his brief but intriguing NFL stint, while Ryan gained fame beyond football, making both choices resonate with different fan groups.