VS
Your GOAT List
What happens when a brooding cowboy meets a brilliant detective? In this electrifying GoatWars matchup, Phil Burbank's magnetic intensity in 'Power of the Dog' collides with Sherlock Holmes's sharp intellect from 'Sherlock'. Here, it's not just about performance prowess; it's a battle for cultural supremacy. Will fans lean towards Phil's subtle, menacing depth or Sherlock's dynamic, fast-paced charm? This isn't just a decision; it’s a statement about what qualities define greatness in acting. How you pick could reshape what we idolize in our screen heroes.
In this battle:
Fans currently prefer Sherlock Holmes in Sherlock over Phil Burbank in 'Power of the Dog' when it comes to the greatest Benedict Cumberbatch Performances of all time. In head-to-head matchups, fans pick Sherlock Holmes in Sherlock 91.7% of the time over Phil Burbank in 'Power of the Dog'.
Across all battles:
Sherlock Holmes in Sherlock win rate: 75.7%
Phil Burbank in 'Power of the Dog' win rate: 34.2%
Phil Burbank showcases a different side of Cumberbatch's acting chops — rugged, silently intense, and deeply complex. Fans appreciate this role for its emotional depth and the subtle vulnerabilities Phil reveals throughout the film.
Fans absolutely adore Sherlock for his razor-sharp wit and his unique approach to solving mysteries. His iconic phrases and the modern twist on a classic character have left a strong impression, making him a standout in Benedict’s career.
It's neck and neck because fans are torn between Phil's complex, brooding nature and Sherlock's brilliant, quirky detective skills. Each character resonates differently with fans, showcasing Cumberbatch's range and sparking heated debates on which role is his definitive best.