VS
Your GOAT List
Can the stoic resilience of Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' stand against the cerebral charisma of Sherlock Holmes in 'Sherlock'? This isn’t just a showdown between two of Benedict Cumberbatch's striking performances; it's a clash of philosophies. In one corner, Mackenzie's wartime gravity pulls at the heartstrings of historical drama lovers. In the opposite corner, Sherlock’s razor-sharp wit and modern flair captivate those who lean towards intellectual puzzles and contemporary settings. What’s at stake? A reshaping of which performance defines Cumberbatch's legacy. Which weighs more heavily on the scales of greatness: a compelling snapshot of valor or a complex tapestry of deduction?
In this battle:
Fans currently prefer Sherlock Holmes in Sherlock over Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' when it comes to the greatest Benedict Cumberbatch Performances of all time. In head-to-head matchups, fans pick Sherlock Holmes in Sherlock 57.1% of the time over Colonel Mackenzie in '1917'.
Across all battles:
Sherlock Holmes in Sherlock win rate: 75.7%
Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' win rate: 37.6%
Colonel Mackenzie's role in '1917' may have been brief, but it packed a punch. Fans appreciate how Cumberbatch conveyed a deep sense of urgency and authority that was crucial to the film's high-stakes, real-time drama. His performance added a significant weight to an already intense narrative.
Sherlock Holmes is a fan favorite mainly because of how Cumberbatch brought a fresh intensity and modern quirks to an iconic character. His performance made Sherlock not just a brilliant detective but a complex, somewhat enigmatic hero that resonated with a contemporary audience.
It's a clash of titans! Colonel Mackenzie's stellar but brief role showcased a different, more understated side of Cumberbatch's acting prowess, while Sherlock, a role he played over multiple seasons, became iconic for his quirky, sharp-witted portrayal. Fans are torn because both roles highlight such diverse skills.