VS
Your GOAT List
What do a wartime leader and a medieval monarch have in common? More than you'd think, in the Benedict Cumberbatch Performances of All Time league. Colonel Mackenzie from '1917' embodies the urgent, fleeting moments where lives hang in the balance, a stark contrast to Richard III's calculated, sinister power plays in 'The Hollow Crown'. It's a battle between the immediacy of war's gritty realism and the deep, dark intrigue of historical drama. Which performance resonates more deeply with our contemporary sensibilities — the raw urgency of Mackenzie or the timeless machinations of Richard III? Your preference might just reveal more about you than it does about Cumberbatch.
In this battle:
Fans currently prefer Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' over Richard III in The Hollow Crown when it comes to the greatest Benedict Cumberbatch Performances of all time. In head-to-head matchups, fans pick Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' 60.0% of the time over Richard III in The Hollow Crown.
Across all battles:
Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' win rate: 37.5%
Richard III in The Hollow Crown win rate: 17.4%
Richard III's complexity and the historical depth of the role tap into a niche of fans who appreciate classical performances. His portrayal of the twisted king showcases a range of emotions that really highlight his acting chops in a way that's different from more contemporary roles.
It's a classic showdown between modern war drama and timeless Shakespearean tragedy. Fans are drawn into debates over which genre and style of acting showcases Benedict Cumberbatch's talents better. Plus, both roles are emotionally intense, making it a tough pick!
Right now, fans are leaning toward Colonel Mackenzie in '1917', leading the votes. It seems like his gripping, intense portrayal in a high-stakes war setting really resonates with viewers more than the classic but darker Shakespearean role of Richard III.