VS
Your GOAT List
What defines greatness in an actor? Is it the steely resolve of a war-hardened Colonel Mackenzie in '1917', who races against time in a high-stakes environment, or the cunning and theatrical mastery of Richard III in 'The Hollow Crown', who manipulates his way through a tumultuous sea of political intrigue? This GoatWars battle isn't just about choosing a favorite performance; it's about deciding what resonates more deeply with us—raw, on-the-ground heroism or the complex dance of royal deceit. How you weigh in on this dramatic face-off will carve the path toward defining Benedict Cumberbatch's legacy in the arts.
In this battle:
Fans currently prefer Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' over Richard III in The Hollow Crown when it comes to the greatest Benedict Cumberbatch Performances of all time. In head-to-head matchups, fans pick Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' 60.0% of the time over Richard III in The Hollow Crown.
Across all battles:
Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' win rate: 37.6%
Richard III in The Hollow Crown win rate: 15.4%
Richard III is a favorite for fans who love their villains complex and their performances layered. Cumberbatch's portrayal is magnetic, capturing Richard's cunning and ambition with a nuanced depth that leaves viewers both enthralled and horrified.
Colonel Mackenzie's character resonates due to his commanding presence and the high stakes of his mission in the movie. Fans appreciate how Benedict Cumberbatch brings a palpable tension and urgency to the role, enriching the film's dramatic climax.
It's a real nail-biter because both roles showcase Benedict Cumberbatch's range incredibly well. Fans of '1917' admire the intense, stoic leadership of Mackenzie, while 'The Hollow Crown' supporters are all about that deep, Shakespearean drama brought to life by his Richard III. It's a classic clash of cinematic spectacle versus classic theatre!