Greatest Benedict Cumberbatch Performances of All Time
Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' or Phil Burbank in 'Power of the Dog'

Pick Your Favorite

COLONEL MACKENZIE IN '1917'

VS

PHIL BURBANK IN 'POWER OF THE DOG'
0%

Your GOAT List

Why This Battle Matters

Ever pondered what truly defines a monumental performance? In this GoatWars showdown, we pitch Colonel Mackenzie’s steely resolve in '1917' against Phil Burbank’s brooding intensity in 'Power of the Dog'. One, a war hero navigating the brutalities of WWI with iron-clad determination, the other, a complex, tormented rancher wrestling with internal and external conflicts in the American West. This isn’t merely about choosing a favorite; it’s about deciding what resonates more deeply in the annals of film greatness—the visage of steadfast leadership or the intricate portrayal of vulnerability. Whose craft speaks louder to the essence of stellar cinema?

🔥 Fan Takes

IDK guys, Phil's brooding is art but Mackenzie's charge? Gave me chills!
Everyone sleeps on Phil Burbank, but dude's silences were louder than bombs. #underrated
honestly, mckenzie in 1917 hit different, that urgency was just 😮‍💨

How Fans Are Voting

In this battle:

Fans currently prefer Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' over Phil Burbank in 'Power of the Dog' when it comes to the greatest Benedict Cumberbatch Performances of all time. In head-to-head matchups, fans pick Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' 63.2% of the time over Phil Burbank in 'Power of the Dog'.

Across all battles:

Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' win rate: 37.6%

Phil Burbank in 'Power of the Dog' win rate: 34.2%

Fan FAQs

Why is this matchup so close?

This matchup is so close because it showcases Benedict Cumberbatch's incredible ability to immerse himself in vastly different characters. Both roles have their unique charms and showcase his acting prowess, making it tough for fans to pick one over the other.

Why is this matchup between Colonel Mackenzie and Phil Burbank so heated?

The debate is fierce because it pits two of Benedict Cumberbatch's most emotionally contrasting roles against each other — the stoic military man versus the deeply troubled rancher. Each performance pulls at different heartstrings, engaging fans who appreciate his versatility.

Who is better: Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' or Phil Burbank in 'Power of the Dog'?

It's neck and neck right now! Fans are split down the middle because each role shows a different side of Benedict's range. Colonel Mackenzie brings that stern, war-time leadership, while Phil Burbank is all about complex, brooding intensity.