VS
Your GOAT List
Ever pondered what truly defines a monumental performance? In this GoatWars showdown, we pitch Colonel Mackenzie’s steely resolve in '1917' against Phil Burbank’s brooding intensity in 'Power of the Dog'. One, a war hero navigating the brutalities of WWI with iron-clad determination, the other, a complex, tormented rancher wrestling with internal and external conflicts in the American West. This isn’t merely about choosing a favorite; it’s about deciding what resonates more deeply in the annals of film greatness—the visage of steadfast leadership or the intricate portrayal of vulnerability. Whose craft speaks louder to the essence of stellar cinema?
In this battle:
Fans currently prefer Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' over Phil Burbank in 'Power of the Dog' when it comes to the greatest Benedict Cumberbatch Performances of all time. In head-to-head matchups, fans pick Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' 63.2% of the time over Phil Burbank in 'Power of the Dog'.
Across all battles:
Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' win rate: 37.6%
Phil Burbank in 'Power of the Dog' win rate: 34.2%
This matchup is so close because it showcases Benedict Cumberbatch's incredible ability to immerse himself in vastly different characters. Both roles have their unique charms and showcase his acting prowess, making it tough for fans to pick one over the other.
The debate is fierce because it pits two of Benedict Cumberbatch's most emotionally contrasting roles against each other — the stoic military man versus the deeply troubled rancher. Each performance pulls at different heartstrings, engaging fans who appreciate his versatility.
It's neck and neck right now! Fans are split down the middle because each role shows a different side of Benedict's range. Colonel Mackenzie brings that stern, war-time leadership, while Phil Burbank is all about complex, brooding intensity.