VS
Your GOAT List
What happens when steel-eyed determination clashes with brooding intensity? In this GoatWars matchup, Colonel Mackenzie from '1917', a symbol of wartime leadership and urgency, faces off against Phil Burbank from 'Power of the Dog', the embodiment of complex, simmering menace. It's more than just a battle of roles; it's a duel between steadfast resolve and psychological depth. As fans, your preference will echo through the annals of cinematic performances: do you value the heroic, direct leadership or the intricate, layered antagonist? Your choice shapes the legacy of what greatness truly means on screen.
In this battle:
Fans currently prefer Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' over Phil Burbank in 'Power of the Dog' when it comes to the greatest Benedict Cumberbatch Performances of all time. In head-to-head matchups, fans pick Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' 65.0% of the time over Phil Burbank in 'Power of the Dog'.
Across all battles:
Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' win rate: 37.5%
Phil Burbank in 'Power of the Dog' win rate: 33.3%
Sherlock Holmes in 'Sherlock' holds the top spot on the leaderboard. You can check out the full GOAT List to see how others rank!
Phil Burbank in 'Power of the Dog' is a hit for his deep, vulnerability hidden under a tough exterior. Fans love this complexity, revealing how even the toughest characters have their own battles and weaknesses.
Fans are really connecting with Colonel Mackenzie's heroic vibes in '1917'. The intensity and urgency he brings to the role seems to be hitting harder than Phil's complex, brooding nature in 'Power of the Dog'. Plus, that dramatic war setting just captures hearts!