VS
Your GOAT List
In the arena of Benedict Cumberbatch's finest moments, does the quiet intensity of Peter Guillam in 'Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy' outmaneuver the urgent resolve of Colonel Mackenzie in '1917'? Here, we witness a poignant clash of eras—Guillam's Cold War cunning versus Mackenzie's World War I valor. This is more than a simple character comparison; it's a duel over who redefines cinematic heroism. Whose portrayal tugs harder at your allegiances? Does the subtle spy craft appeal more, or does the raw, on-the-battlefield leadership command your respect? Your preference will tip the scales in this fierce debate over Cumberbatch's theatrical legacy.
In this battle:
Fans currently prefer Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' over Peter Guillam in 'Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy' when it comes to the greatest Benedict Cumberbatch Performances of all time. In head-to-head matchups, fans pick Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' 54.5% of the time over Peter Guillam in 'Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy'.
Across all battles:
Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' win rate: 37.5%
Peter Guillam in 'Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy' win rate: 37.0%
Sherlock Holmes in 'Sherlock' holds the title of the #1 contender right now. Check out where everyone else stands on the GOAT List.
Both roles show off Benedict's incredible range and subtlety, capturing different facets of wartime bravery. It's tough for fans to choose—each character leaves a lasting impression for different reasons, making this one of the most evenly matched debates in the league.
It's a tight race but currently, Colonel Mackenzie from '1917' is slightly ahead. Fans seem to resonate with the intensity and urgency he brings to the role, capturing hearts with that standout performance in a visually striking film.