Greatest Benedict Cumberbatch Performances of All Time
Khan in 'Star Trek Into Darkness' or Colonel Mackenzie in '1917'
Pick Your Favorite
VS
Your GOAT List
Why This Battle Matters
Doesn't the struggle between Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' and Khan in 'Star Trek Into Darkness' feel like a classical orchestra clashing with a bold, futuristic synth? On one side, we have Mackenzie, the embodiment of duty and the gravitas of wartime leadership in stark, brutal reality. On the other, Khan exudes charisma and ruthless intelligence, a villain crafted for a universe of boundless possibilities and moral complexities. This battle isn't just about who entertained more; it's a question of what resonates deeper with the audience: stark, gritty realism or high-stakes, fantastical conflict. How do you measure greatness? Is it the weight of history or the thrill of the future?
🔥 Fan Takes
How Fans Are Voting
In this battle:
The contenders are currently tied in head-to-head matchups. Your vote will break the tie.
Fan FAQs
How has Khan from 'Star Trek Into Darkness' captured such a dedicated fan base?
Khan steals the show with his intense intelligence and a menacing charm. Fans appreciate this complex villain who mixes depth, strength, and a certain tragic gravitas, making him one of the most memorable antagonists in the Star Trek universe.
What makes Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' so loved by fans?
Fans really connect with the urgency and gravity Colonel Mackenzie brings to '1917.' His role, though brief, is pivotal and emotionally charged, capturing the ‘do-or-die’ essence of wartime leadership that resonates deeply with audiences.
Why is the matchup between Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' and Khan in 'Star Trek Into Darkness' so evenly split in votes?
This matchup is razor-close because both roles showcase Benedict Cumberbatch's versatility—an officer in an intense WWI drama versus a charismatic sci-fi villain. Fans of '1917' admire the emotional depth of Mackenzie, while 'Star Trek' fans love Khan's complex antagonism. It's a tough call when both performances hit so differently!