home ⟩ Movies & TV ⟩ Benedict Cumberbatch Performances ⟩ Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' vs. Khan in 'Star Trek Into Darkness'

Greatest Benedict Cumberbatch Performances of All Time
Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' or Khan in 'Star Trek Into Darkness'

Pick Your Favorite

COLONEL MACKENZIE IN '1917'

VS

KHAN IN 'STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS'
0%

Your GOAT List

Why This Battle Matters

Imagine a cinematic universe where Colonel Mackenzie's stoic command in the trenches of '1917' clashes with the cold, calculating intellect of Khan from 'Star Trek Into Darkness'. Here, we aren’t just witnessing a battle of characters, but a profound clash of philosophies. Mackenzie’s grounded, war-torn realism versus Khan’s futuristic, strategic villainy encapsulates an epic showdown of historical grit against sci-fi cunning. What’s at stake? A reshaping of the podium in the Benedict Cumberbatch Performances league, challenging fans to decide: do we honor the vivid portrayal of human resilience or the chilling embodiment of cerebral dominance?

🔥 Fan Takes

Lol are we really arguing this? 😂 Khan was like a villain buffet, had everything you needed to love to hate him.
Honestly, Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' brought the feels. That urgency? Chills, every time.
bro, khan had layers. so intense, so deep. mackenzie was cool but kinda one-note?

How Fans Are Voting

In this battle:

The contenders are currently tied in head-to-head matchups. Your vote will break the tie.

Fan FAQs

Who's the #1 contender on GoatWars in the Greatest Benedict Cumberbatch Performances of All Time league?

The top dog right now is Sherlock Holmes from 'Sherlock'! Given the iconic nature of this role, it's no surprise fans have rallied behind it. Check out how Sherlock stacks against other unforgettable Cumberbatch roles on the GOAT List.

Why is this matchup between Colonel Mackenzie and Khan so close?

This matchup is close because both roles show off Benedict Cumberbatch's range in starkly different ways. Colonel Mackenzie is all about subtle, intense emotion, while Khan delivers that explosive, charismatic antagonism. Fans are torn because each performance pulls at different heartstrings, showing just how versatile Cumberbatch is.

Who is better: Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' or Khan in 'Star Trek Into Darkness'?

It's a nail-biter between Colonel Mackenzie and Khan! Fans are split right down the middle. Some love Mackenzie for his intense, albeit brief, role that added real tension to '1917'. Others are all in for Khan's charismatic yet menacing vibe in 'Star Trek'. It's all about what flavor of Cumberbatch you prefer — understated heroics or over-the-top villainy.