Greatest Benedict Cumberbatch Performances of All Time
Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' or Khan in 'Star Trek Into Darkness'
Pick Your Favorite
VS
Your GOAT List
Why This Battle Matters
Colonel Mackenzie in '1917', the stoic leader mired in the muddy trenches of World War I, squares off against Khan, the genetically enhanced superhuman from 'Star Trek Into Darkness'. One embodies the gritty reality of war and leadership under duress, while the other encapsulates futuristic rebellion and raw charisma. This isn't just a battle over who stole more scenes; it's about which performance reshapes our understanding of heroism and villainy. In choosing, the fans declare what resonates more deeply with them: historical gravitas or sci-fi spectacle?
🔥 Fan Takes
How Fans Are Voting
In this battle:
The contenders are currently tied in head-to-head matchups. Your vote will break the tie.
Fan FAQs
Why do fans love Colonel Mackenzie in '1917'?
Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' resonates with fans because of the raw emotional intensity that Benedict Cumberbatch brings to this high-stakes role. His performance captures the urgency and the burden of command during WWI, providing a brief yet powerful impact on screen that leaves a lasting impression.
What makes Khan in 'Star Trek Into Darkness' so popular?
Fans adore Khan for his complex villainy and the depth Benedict Cumberbatch brings to the role. His portrayal is intense, charismatic, and layered, making Khan not just a typical antagonist but a memorable and formidable one that stands out in the sci-fi universe.
Why is the matchup between Colonel Mackenzie in '1917' and Khan in 'Star Trek Into Darkness' so close?
It's a nail-biter because fans are split down the middle! Both roles highlight different aspects of Benedict Cumberbatch's versatility—his stoic leadership as Mackenzie versus his intense villainy as Khan. Each character has its distinct appeal, pulling loyal fans from both dramatic and sci-fi genres.